YAKUTIA - OUR OPINION ON WAY TO UNITY AND CONSENT

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION:
article 2: "the person, his rights and freedom are supreme value …"
article 3: "the carrier of the sovereignty and unique source of
the power in the Russian Federation are multinational people … "
article 29: "to everyone thought and word freedom is guaranteed … "

MAKE FUTURE IN THE PRESENT íà ãëàâíóþ ñòðàíèöó | â èçáðàííîå | íàïèñàòü ïèñüìî |

"ÍÀÑÒÎßÙÈÉ ÌÀÒÅÐÈÀË (ÈÍÔÎÐÌÀÖÈß) ÏÐÎÈÇÂÅÄÅÍ, ÐÀÑÏÐÎÑÒÐÀÍÅÍ È (ÈËÈ) ÍÀÏÐÀÂËÅÍ ÈÍÎÑÒÐÀÍÍÛÌ ÀÃÅÍÒÎÌ ¹247 ÏÅÒÐΠÑÒÅÏÀÍ ÞÐÜÅÂÈ×, ¹296 ÀÂÒÎÍÎÌÍÀß ÍÅÊÎÌÌÅÐ×ÅÑÊÀß ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈß ÏÎ ÇÀÙÈÒÅ ÏÐÀ ×ÅËÎÂÅÊÀ È ÈÍÔÎÐÌÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÞ ÍÀÑÅËÅÍÈß «ßÊÓÒÈß - ÍÀØÅ ÌÍÅÍÈÅ» ËÈÁÎ ÊÀÑÀÅÒÑß ÄÅßÒÅËÜÍÎÑÒÈ ÈÍÎÑÒÐÀÍÍÎÃÎ ÀÃÅÍÒÀ ¹247 ÏÅÒÐΠÑÒÅÏÀÍ ÞÐÜÅÂÈ×, ¹296 ÀÂÒÎÍÎÌÍÀß ÍÅÊÎÌÌÅÐ×ÅÑÊÀß ÎÐÃÀÍÈÇÀÖÈß ÏÎ ÇÀÙÈÒÅ ÏÐÀ ×ÅËÎÂÅÊÀ È ÈÍÔÎÐÌÈÐÎÂÀÍÈÞ ÍÀÑÅËÅÍÈß «ßÊÓÒÈß - ÍÀØÅ ÌÍÅÍÈÅ»








PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Through UN mechanisms:

UNIVERSAL PERIodic REVIEW

 

 

Dear colleagues!

 

We offer material on the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) to develop suggestions and recommendations for implementing human rights in Russia.

Information source is  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/RUSession16.aspx 

The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007, held its sixteenth session from 22 April to 3 May 2013.

The review of the Russian Federation was held at the 12th meeting on 29 April 2013. The delegation of the Russian Federation was headed by the Minster of Justice,  Alexander Konovalov. At its 18th meeting,  held on 3 May 2013, the Working Group adopted the report on the Russian Federation.

Russian delegation noted that the legacy of the past and various unfavourable factors inherited had continued to impair the realization of human rights. Systemic risks, such as arbitrariness of decisions taken by public and municipal officials, insufficient responsiveness and effectiveness of the courts, and the low level of public dialogue in society remained, and these had been taken into account in designing new measures.

The Commissioner of Human Rights in the Russian Federation stated that citizens’ insufficient awareness of their constitutional rights and the lack of ability to properly claim those rights remained one of the problems impeding the full realisation of rights enshrined in the Constitution and domestic legislation.

He noted the existing discrepancy between the principles and provisions of the Constitution and legislation, and their implementation in practice.

During the interactive dialogue, 102 delegations made statements. Russian Federation received 231 recommendations.

In all, the Russian Federation accepts 149 recommendations, including those whose content and wording the authorities support, and others that have already been put into practice or are being implemented.

The Russian Federation partially accepts 14 recommendations, some of which, although meeting with the authorities’ overall approval, cannot be fully supported because they contain elements that, for various reasons, cannot be put into practice. 

The Russian Federation does not accept 68 recommendations. It cannot support them either because they contradict the letter, spirit or practical implementation of the law or certain trends in its development, or because the assertions made in them reveal factual inaccuracies and inconsistencies.

 

Russia’s dialogue with world community likes a "communication with the deaf-blind". Russian officials are guided by principle of "see nothing, hear nothing" and "think one thing, say another, do third". 

Russian authorities bring situation to a deadlock and often recourse to blatant lies and outright deception of world community. In the end, it harms more population of Russia, where the governance principles  are roughly discredited, than the UN bodies.

Russia presented false and untrue information On several issues.

Russia’s arguments on certain issues come into direct conflict with information of UN bodies and interested organizations.

RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY is cynical and hypocritical, it is based on double standards.

Russian foreign policy agencies, as part of the state mechanism, act in the interests of corrupt officials and oligarchs, and interests of the majority of Russian population are ignored.

Russia is constrained by formal phrases such as “due to contradiction in normative content”, “the provisions of the United Nations resolution are not binding, but rather recommendatory in nature”, “it is not a part of the international obligations of the Russian Federation”, “reject due to factual inaccuracies and inconsistencies of the assertions”.

Such verbiage of Russian foreign policy makers is the only argument of denying the need to implement international norms. It defies any criticism and contrary to common sense.

Russian authorities ignore many recommendations concerning the society interests such as interests of civil society activists, human rights defenders, indigenous peoples and journalists.

Refusal of Russia from full realization of human rights led to total arbitrariness and ubiquity of lawlessness.

It led to the following hazards:

-usurpation of power by the minority;

-denial of legitimate rights of the majority;

-formation of slavish exploitation of the majority.

The system of slavish exploitation is a complete lack of socially-oriented state policy, arbitrariness of employers, complicity of government, population income below poverty line and understated minimum social standards.

Productive forces and natural resources of Russia are aimed only at formation of good life of officials and oligarchs. This led to unequal distribution of national income of Russia, which is made not by officials and oligarchs, but by all Russians working in various fields.

Officials and oligarchs do not produce surplus value, but only usurp natural, administrative, political and other kinds of rent, that is, dispose and distribute what is not theirs.

Living space in Russia (profitable business, high-paying jobs, lucrative public contracts) is distributed among officials and oligarchs, their relatives and friends. It is not possible to ensure equal starting opportunities to all the people of Russia.

In fact feudal slavish system is approved that deprives future of further generations of Russians.

It violates the constitutional rights and the international norms relating to access to housing, food, education and medicine. Ordinary Russians can not normally live, eat, learn and be treated.

Instead of the right to decent work, the right to perpetual economic slavery is approved in Russia, as wages of ordinary people may not ensure a decent life.

According to official state data, less than 20% of the Russian population has income below the subsistence minimum. But really the majority of Russians live below poverty line because undervaluation of minimum social standards, low real purchasing power of cash income, unreliability of average statistical data, overestimating prices and tariffs.

Real information on the actual socio-economic situation of Russia will be presented to the UN bodies.

Absence of conditions for a decent life not only leads to lower quality of life, but also to elementary hunger and total poverty, consequence of which is physical extinction of population.

Massive violations of the rights to decent life threatens physical survival of RUSSIAN POPULATION.

Actually, it is the deliberate creation of unbearable living conditions in order to suppress the will and desires of the citizens of Russia on the implementation of their legal rights to a decent life. Under certain circumstances it may be classified as creating conditions for genocide.

Systematic appeals of international organizations to Russian authorities to respect human rights is primarily connected with implementing human rights and not with political opposition of different countries.

Thus, implementing human rights is not associated with activities of "enemies of Russia" and "politically motivated" acts of NGOs. But it is the main constitutional purpose of existence of Russian state - observance and protection of fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens.

 

Russia justifies its irresponsibility and violation of human rights because:

-some international norms are contrary to state policy;

-nature of UN resolutions is recommendatory;

-intrigues of political rivals - "enemies of Russia".

Russia simply abuses international law, legalizing tyranny and lawlessness.

HOW may universally recognized international norms and right to a decent life contrary to Russian state policy?

What relation to poverty, famine and physical extinction of Russians is the European Union, NATO and other "enemies"?

Russia states one argument that it is impossible to provide a decent life for majority because there is no financial capacity of the country's budget. But it could be taken in  situation with poor African countries.

Russia’s priorities of budget spending do not take into account interests of the majority of population. Use of natural resources and productive forces is aimed at enriching the minority.

If Russian authorities have not enough money to ensure a decent life for majority, how to ensure good living of minority, when 1.5% of Russia's population own 50% of the national assets?

How did 131 Russian billionaires with a total capital of 147 billion appear?

Why do Russian billionaires pay the lowest taxes in the world (13%) when their counterparts pay the higher taxes: in France and Sweden (57%), Denmark (61%) and Italy (66%)?

Why are billions of dollars spent for extremely expensive summits and sporting events, when the majority live in poverty ?

Why is the ratio of income of the richest 10% and poorest citizens in Russia 45 times or more, and in developed countries 6-7 times, with maximum critical value of 10, above which uncontrollable social antagonizing begins and security risks for state existing occur  ?

Why does social impact of economic development affect mainly the only Russians with the highest income and lower-income groups consistently have low quality of living ?

Why is the share of public expenditure on social services (education, health, culture, etc.) in developed countries - 70%, in Russia - 15%?

Why is the share of public expenditure on the state apparatus, internal security and defense in the developed countries - 11%, in Russia - 42%?

Why does capital outflow, held for money laundering, equal annual 3-4% of gross domestic product (for the period 1994-2012 years, the 343 billion dollars were derived from Russia)? 

Facts indicate that, in contrast to developed countries, RUSSIA have not full socially oriented state policy and enrichment of the minority HAPPENED ILLEGALLY with violations of social justice principles.

As a result of unfair privatization, they became billionaires as opposed to foreign entrepreneurs whose capitals were formed over a long period of time.

Overseas employees, holding shares, participate in decision-making and are interested in achieving the overall result of the enterprise. In Russia, the employees are often disenfranchised people who depend on arbitrariness of the owner. Russian relationship between employees and employer is based on slavish exploitation in order to maximize profits but abroad it is based on equal social partnership.

It is false that Russia has not possibility of ensuring decent life for majority of Russians due to lack of financial ability of budget.

Russian politicians just lies when they, answering questions on implementing provisions of decent material standard of living, say that it is contrary to state policy and state has no financial resources.

Russia has enough financial resources to increase the incomes of Russians and the Constitution of Russia identifies as a priority to ensure decent life for citizens.

It is obvious that there is a contradiction between international law and "state policy of Russia", which replaced by interests of enrichment of minority.

The strategy of "live well at the expense of slavish exploitation of the majority and  predatory extraction of natural resources" not focused on the main purpose of functioning of the Russian state and the constitutional right to decent life.

According to the explanatory memorandum to the draft Federal Law "On the rights of Russian citizens on incomes from exploitation of natural resources of the Russian Federation", proper redistribution of revenues from natural resources provide a possibility of paying annually several living minimum to every Russian citizen.

Of course, it's not so much money, but in any case it is better than transfer of funds to intermediaries, engaged in bringing them to population, in the face of government agencies, officials and bankers.

It will clearly lead to positive results coupled with introduction of a progressive income tax scale, increasing the understated social standards, stimulating private consumption and other socially oriented measures. 

 

IF RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES WANT TO CONTINUE MAKing statements on INABILITY to ensure decent life for the majority, they should change the constitution of RUSSIA and APPROVE that the main objective is not to ensure the rights and freedoms of citizens but only to PROVIDe rights of officials and oligarchs for good LIFE THROUGH slavish exploitation of population and destructive extraction of natural resources.

It will be fair and nobody can accuse Russia of lying and deception.

In that case Russian authorities may honestly state at global level that international standards for decent life are contrary to the Constitution of Russia and its legal system.

And Russia has obligations only to officials and oligarchs. And all attempts of improving life for majority are "intrigues of the enemies" and interference in internal affairs.

However, it should be noted that the rules of international law were developed to improve the lives of people, but not to justify the irresponsible policies of different countries.

 

There are massive and flagrant violations of human rights for a long time in Russia. In 2009 Russian NGOs stated that the recommendations of UN treaty bodies are generally not performed and published.

It may continue indefinitely without applying relevant sanctions to Russia.

RUSSIA discredits the international protection of human rights that requires adoption of measures at international level.

Therefore, I propose to initiate a more detailed consideration of the human rights situation in Russia and take adequate measures in order to:

-adjust legislation and law enforcement practice in Russia;

-prosecute Russia for false information and failure to comply with human rights.

It is important to use all available international instruments to influence the situation. In the case of exhausting all means, it is necessary to take appropriate enforcement measures against Russia in the framework of the international legal responsibility.

 

The principles of international legal responsibility mean that:

-every subject of international law is responsible for its behavior in relation to its obligations under international law;

-act of subject of international law consists in action or inaction.

In this case, Russia violates the rights of citizens to decent life enshrined in international law.

Therefore, in the case of exhausting all means to realize human rights, the United Nations bodies and other stakeholders MUST TAKE adequate coercive MEASURES against RUSSIA, that is, apply sanctions enshrined in international law.

Sanctions are coercive measures taken against a state which has committed an international illegal act or has seriously breached an international rule or obligation, by a state or a group of states or decided by an international organization.

The essence of negative effects of sanctions is implementing the principle "the suffering of the population will lead to pressure on the government".

Poor, hungry and destitute majority of Russian population, which has lost the last hope for better life, uniquely will support these measures.

The aim is to suppress for improving the situation that will ensure removal of the sanctions regime.

During discussion we propose to select the following sanctions:

1.Trade sanctions (full or partial embargo, cessation of maintenance);

2.Financial sanctions (blocking foreign government assets, limited access to financial markets, the termination of the provision of financial assistance);

3.Sanctions on movement (ban on movement of certain individuals or groups of individuals beyond the borders of state, ban on movement of any means of communication);

4.Diplomatic sanctions (complete or partial withdrawal of members of diplomatic missions from the target country; revocation of diplomatic visas);

5.Sport and cultural sanctions (prohibition against participation of person or group of persons, representing the target country, in sport events.; termination of scientific, technical and cultural cooperation through exchanges and visits involving persons or groups of persons, representing the target country);

6.Procedural sanctions (suspension or deprivation of voting rights, deprivation of the right to representation in elected bodies of international organizations, rejection or exclusion from membership in international organizations).

The most common sanctions are the following sanctions:

-ban on travel. It is used exclusively against persons responsible for the unlawful acts of the state. It consists in banning such persons to leave territory of the state.

-Freezing of assets. It is used exclusively against persons responsible for the unlawful acts of the state. It consists in prohibition to use the assets of such persons located outside of the state.

-Arms embargo. It is used against the state. It consists in prohibition to all other States to supply weapons or their components in volume, amount and on the terms provided by the UN Security Council.

Also, it is appropriate to consider blocking foreign assets of Russia and Russia's exclusion from international organizations because asset management and internationalk activity carry out not in the interests of the majority of Russian population, but only in the interests of OFFICIALS and oligarchs.

Regardless of status, all persons responsible for human rights violations must be prosecuted. After all, when a person commits an offense, he must be brought to justice, but not to refer to "the enemies."

There is good practice of applying bans on travel and freezing of assets for specific guilty officials.

For practical implementation of the principle of inevitability of punishment, it is necessary to find the persons responsible for human rights violations in Russia and bring them to justice.

Sanctions regime could be removed after adoption of measures on elimination of infringements of human rights.

We propose to consider the statement of NGO "Yakutia – Our Opinion", as a basis of urgent actions, was circulated at the High-level segment (annual ministerial review) of Substantive 2013 session of the United Nations Economic and Social Council in Geneva, Switzerland.

Statement available at http://yakutian.org/N1330901.pdf

 

It should be noted that all the initiatives of NGO "Yakutia - Our Opinion" aimed at protecting human rights to decent life and access to fair justice. Our initiatives may not be interpreted as politically motivated acts.

Their goal is not to make changes in political system and state mechanism, but mainly include economic and legal issues. This does not contradict the principles of state functioning.

ACTIVITY OF NGO "Yakutia - OUR OPINION" is carried out strictly within the legal framework and aimed at preserving political stability.

 

Due to precedents of claims of Russian authorities against legitimate activity of our organization, I, Stepan Petrov, Chief of NGO "Yakutia - Our Opinion" inform publicly that appropriate measures will be taken at global level in the case of initiation of hostile actions to impede development of initiatives to implement the human rights under the authority given by Special Consultative Status with the ECOSOC of the United Nations.

In that case, relevant applications will be submitted for taking adequate measures against Russia to the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Economic and Social Council, the Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of Human Rights Defenders and other UN bodies.

We will also inform the European Union, relevant international organizations and world’s leading human rights organizations.

It should be noted that the United Nations representatives recognized some of the arguments of Russian diplomats unfounded and biased. It was confirmed that some of the actions of Russian officials are illegal and provocative.

Subject to ensure normal activity and safety of human rights defenders is relevant and given due attention at the highest level.

In September 2013, UN Secretaty-General Ban Ki-moon denounced cases of reprisals against NGOs engaging in the UPR.

At the 24th session of the Human Rights Council (HRC) the UN Secretary-General presented his annual report "Cooperation with the United Nations, its representatives and mechanisms in the field of human rights". The report describes specific cases of reprisals against NGOs engaging with human rights mechanisms, including the UPR.

Ban Ki-moon reiterated that "reprisals and intimidation against individuals cooperating with the United Nations in the field of human rights are unacceptable" and called on the HRC to "act to address cases of reprisal in a coherent and systematic manner and use the various tools it has at its disposal".

Non-governmental organizations play an important role in relationship between civil society and the States. Therefore, all facts of countering activities of human rights defenders and trends in this area should be considered at the highest level, primarily through the activities of the UN General Assembly.

 

We must promote initiatives and proposals to global level for full realization of human rights.

We have the opportunity to make suggestions through various UN mechanisms (UPR, the UN treaty bodies, special procedures, etc.) through UN bodies, the States participating in the interactive dialogue and stakeholders who have the right to submit alternative reports.

The materials of the UPR have a lot of relevant topics: human rights legislation and institutions; international cooperation in the field of human rights; promotion of tolerance; right to life, liberty and security of the person; administration of justice and the judicial system; civil liberties, NGOs, human rights defenders, journalists and elections; economic, social and cultural rights, rights of ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples.

At present, Russian NGOs have accumulated a vast array of information on the human rights situation. I find it necessary to use it to correct russian legislation and law practice.

Human rights work in this area may be bilateral (both "particular to general" and  "general to particular") and is aimed at:

-correcting russian legislation through providing information on the human rights situation in order to strengthen operating efficiency of members of interactive dialogue in the UN;

-correcting law and judicial practices through applying the UN decisions.

It should be aimed at addressing the underlying legal issues:

-lack of specific mechanisms of full realization of human rights in Russia, when law practices do not meet the stated declarations;

-legal ambiguity, allowing arbitrary interpretation of various events and actions in favor of political and other conditions;

-direct violation of human rights by representatives of state bodies and other entities, their irresponsibility, problem with implementing principle of inevitability of punishment.

 

In order to use the potential of the highest law enforcement body of the world community - the UN Human Rights Council in practical protection of human rights,

We urge to participate in:

-developing recommendations, conclusions and other decisions of the HRC on actual issues;

-implementing the UN resolutions through correcting legislation and law practice in Russia;

-developing and applying long-term measures to realize legal position of the United Nations in Russia’s decision-making process.

 

Samples  of developing own proposals

 

Sample No.1

Germany made recommendation ¹140.122 - Establish an independent body responsible for the appointment, promotion, transfer and discharge of judges (Germany).

Russia did not accept it and informed that the relevant independent bodies have already been established.

However, there are many instances of crimes committed by judges and avoiding responsibility. Often, the supervisory authorities cover up crimes by their colleagues.

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation is inactive and inefficient in many cases.

The following may be done:

1.-present facts to refute the position of Russia.

2.-propose project of new structure or mechanism to monitor the work of judges.

 

Sample No.2

Netherlands made recommendation ¹140.191 - Investigate all cases of aggressions or threats against human rights defenders, journalists, and civil society activists (Netherlands).

Russia accepted it.

However, the practice of investigations is often ineffective. In most cases, results may be achieved only by putting pressure from civil society.

The following may be done:

-offer a special mechanism to consider such cases in view of social significance of their activities. 

 

Sample No.3

France made recommendation ¹140.104 - Adopt and implement a law prohibiting the use of confessions obtained under torture.

Russia accepted it. Article 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that evidence, obtained in violation of the law, are not inadmissible.

According to human rights organizations accusations on complaints of torture are often imposed for less serious offences (abuse of power, coercion to testify).

The following may be done:

-offer a mechanism to uniquely qualify such actions as torture.

 

Sample No.4

Denmark made a recommendation ¹140.223. - Officially endorse the United Nations  Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and fully implement all relevant national laws and regulations.

Russia did not accept it and stated that Russian legislation and law enforcement practice in respect of the rights of indigenous peoples and the preservation and development of their cultures goes substantially further than the provisions of the Declaration, extending its boundaries. Legislation already gives small indigenous peoples priority in the use of land and natural resources.

Russia presented false and untrue information.

Indigenous peoples are still deprived of priority access to lands and natural resources, and cannot influence activities of industrial enterprises, operating on their traditional lands. 

Russian officials removed norms from legislation on free use of lands by indigenous peoples.

Despite the adoption of the Federal law «On territories of traditional nature use of indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation» there is not a single territory of traditional nature use.

The following may be done:

-offer mechanism to enforce the rights of indigenous peoples and measures to prosecute Russian authorities for infringement of the rights of indigenous peoples.

 

Sample No.5

The United States presented a recommendation ¹ 140.26 - Amend the law “On counteracting extremist activities” to define extremism in terms of actual use of violence. 

Russia did not accept it. The current practice of identifying extremism makes it possible to prosecute any unwanted subjects of civil society.

The following may be done:

-offer to articulate a definition of "extremism" in order to prevent any prosecution of human rights activists.

 

You can submit your proposals to e-mail: post@yakutian.org or

postal address: PO Box 70, Post Office 27, 677027 Yakutsk, Russian Federation

Phone: +7(914)224-24-11

 

Chief

NGO "Yakutia - Our Opinion"

in Special Consultative Status

with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations

Stepan Petrov

 

 

 

REVIEW

of some recommendations of the States and Russia's position

 

The recommendations are grouped in 9 thematic clusters. Items 140.*** are recommendations of the States. The following is the position of Russia and, if available, clarification of position.

A brief commentary of the author is provided on each thematic cluster.

Information of the UN bodies and interested organizations coincides with author’s position in the majority of issues. It testifies that Russia presented false and inaccurate information, as well as non-acceptance of effective measures.

Information of UN bodies and interested organizations is available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/RUSession16.aspx

You can see topical information on violation of civil rights in Russia in the report of the world's leading human rights organization Human Rights Watch «Laws of Attrition. Crackdown on Russia’s Civil Society after Putin’s Return to the Presidency» at

http://www.hrw.org/reports/2013/04/24/laws-attrition

 

 

1. Human rights legislation and institutions

 

140.56. Continue the policy of expanding opportunities in the existing legislation and mechanisms of influence of civil society in decision-making process (Kazakhstan) - accepted;

140.57. Continue policies aimed at intensifying the fight against all forms of corruption (Kazakhstan) - accepted;

140.58. Continue its efforts to intensify the fight against all forms of corruption (Morocco) - accepted;

140.59. Encourage openness and transparency in the functioning of the public bodies (Kyrgyzstan) - accepted;

140.60. Give continuity to legislative and institutional reforms for the promotion and protection of human rights (Nepal) - accepted;

140.61. Actively engage with public councils under the  State bodies while developing measures aimed at ensuring human rights in a more comprehensive manner (Sri Lanka) - accepted;

140.26. Amend the law “On counteracting extremist activities” to define extremism in terms of actual use of violence (United States of America) – not accepted;

Russia's position. The detailed definition of extremism set forth in the legislation is not contrary to the Russian Federation’s international commitments and is duly applied by law enforcement agencies and the courts.

 

Author's comment

Russia continues to create a semblance of ”rampant activity” on implementation of international standards. In reality, human rights in Russia are grossly violated.

There are systemic problems associated with the lack of specific mechanisms for the full implementation of human rights, when law enforcement practices do not meet the declarations.

There is no effective system of civilian control over activities of state authorities. The existing authority system led to actual elimination of social responsibility of officials at all levels.

Despite of implementation of administrative and budget reforms have still not met the legality and transparency in the expenditure of budgetary funds.

In Russia there is no effective fight against corruption. Article 20 of the UN Convention against Corruption is not ratified. A number of existing international anti-corruption standards are not implemented.  According to the international organization Transparency International Russia ranked 154th on the annual Corruption Perceptions Index of 178 countries.

Political environment in Russia is not competitive. Rro-Kremlin United Russia party have a dominant position. There are violations of Principles of Democracy in Russian electoral system.

2. International cooperation in the field of human rights

140.65. Extend a standing invitation to all thematic special procedures (Montenegro) – not accepted;

Russia's position. The Russian Federation regularly receives visits from special procedures of the Human Rights Council and will, to the extent that it is able, continue to do so, taking into account the importance to it of any given matter and the need to prepare for such visits properly.

140.66. Extend a standing invitation to special procedures (Guatemala) – not accepted;

140.67. Invite the Special Rapporteur on the  situation of  human  rights defenders to visit (Norway) – not accepted;

140.68. Issue a standing invitation to all special procedures mandate holders and respond positively to requests for their visits (Slovenia) – not accepted;

140.69. Issue a standing invitation to all United Nations Special Procedures and ratify OP-CAT and establish its national preventive mechanism accordingly (Czech Republic) – not accepted;

140.70. Present its standing invitation to the special procedures of the United Nations  Human Rights Council  (The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) – not accepted;

 

Author's comment

Special procedure is one of the most effective tools of detailed consideration of the human rights situation. This mechanism provides to develop the most effective and comprehensive recommendations on elimination of the revealed violations.

Russian authorities are simply afraid to invite special procedures. They want to conceal negative human rights situation and avoid responsibility, as it will lead to disclosure of gross violations of human rights and adoption of relevant procedural decisions at the international level.

3. Equality and non-discrimination – general issues

140.75. Introduce a definition of direct and indirect discrimination to prevent discrimination in specific spheres, such as those relating to women, children, migrants and indigenous peoples (Paraguay) – not accepted;

Russia's position. Russian law already contains a detailed definition of both direct and indirect discrimination.

Acts of discrimination are punishable under criminal and administrative law. The Criminal Code and the Code of Administrative Offences each contain definitions of discrimination. Moreover, the victims of such acts are entitled to sue the perpetrator for damages.

 

Author's comment

There is no effective practice of accountability on the facts of discrimination. In most cases, law enforcement and judicial authorities refuse such cases. Successful cases of  discrimination in recruitment are exceptional.

 

 

4. Promotion of tolerance. Combating racism,

racial discrimination and xenophobia

 

140.85. Continue efforts to address hate crimes and racially motivated attacks against ethnic and religious minorities, including racial profiling by law enforcement personnel (Botswana) - accepted;

Russia's position. The authorities investigate such crimes with the utmost diligence and will continue to take all the necessary steps to establish the identity of the perpetrators and bring them to justice.

           

Author's comment

We note extremely low efficiency of counteraction to such crimes. The inaction of law enforcement agencies in this field provokes the growth of xenophobia and impunity for perpetrators. In some cases, law enforcement officials commit crimes on ethnic and religious basis.

 

5. Right to life, liberty and security of the person.

Combating human trafficking

 

140.102. Ending use of arbitrary detention, torture and excessive force by law enforcement officials (United States of America) – not accepted;

Russia's position. Because of factual inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the recommendation’s content and form.

The law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation do not engage in arbitrary detentions, torture or excessive use of force. Detention and other coercive measures are carried out in accordance with procedural law, which provides effective safeguards against civil rights violations.

Any instances of improper treatment of detainees are duly investigated by the Investigative Committee and Office of the Procurator-General. Law enforcement officers found guilty are subject to prosecution as stipulated under the law.

140.104. Adopt and implement a law prohibiting the use of confessions obtained under torture (France) - accepted;

Russia's position. Under Article 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, evidence obtained in violation of the law (including through the use of violence, torture and other cruel or degrading treatment) is inadmissible. Such evidence does not have legal force and may not be used as grounds for prosecution.

 

Author's comment

Russia’s information on absence of the practice of arbitrary detention, torture and excessive use of force is false.

In Russia there are many facts of crimes against detainees citizens committed by law enforcement officials.

In most cases, consideration of applications is carried out formally and does not lead to prosecution of perpetrators. Often officers, who consider such messages, use the solidarity principle in their activity and cover up crimes by their colleagues. There is no effective control mechanism for considering such applications.

According to human rights organizations accusations on complaints of torture are often imposed for less serious offences (abuse of power, coercion to testify).

The law enforcement system of Russia is configured to mitigation of prosecution of guilty law enforcement officials, engaged in torture and violent actions. It leads to avoiding prosecution and stimulates growth of crime among law enforcement officials.

 

6. Administration of justice and the judicial system

 

140.120. Pursue reforms of the Judiciary as well as its efforts to guarantee and facilitate access to justice for all its citizens (Morocco) - accepted;

Russia's position. The Russian authorities have already made extensive regulatory and organizational changes in this area in recent years.

One of the main challenges in the development of the judicial system is to ensure access to justice for citizens and maximum transparency in the work of the courts. A Federal Act that came into force in 2010 made mandatory the publication on the Internet of the texts of judicial instruments and other information relating to the activities of the judicial system as a whole, as well as of individual courts and judges.

The Federal Act on Free Legal Assistance, which came into force in January 2012, provides further guarantees of access to qualified legal advice for citizens.

An effective mechanism has been established to ensure that trials are held and court rulings are executed within a reasonable time, allowing citizens to claim compensation for unreasonable delays by the authorities in this respect.

An appeals chamber dealing with all categories of cases has been set up in courts of general jurisdiction to speed up the judgement review process.

A new Code of Judicial Ethics adopted in December 2012 gives a detailed explanation of the mandatory rules of conduct for all judges in both their professional and other activities.

The Russian authorities intend to continue their efforts to make further improvements to the judicial system, which they consider to be the most important mechanism in a modern State governed by the rule of law.

140.121. Continue efforts on judicial reform, ensuring  meaningful,  independent accountability mechanisms and improved transparency throughout the judicial process (Canada) - accepted;

140.122. Establish an independent body responsible for the appointment, promotion, transfer and discharge of judges (Germany) – not accepted;

Russia's position. The relevant independent bodies have already been established.

Under the Constitution, federal court judges are appointed by the President of the Russian Federation. Justices of the peace are appointed to their duties by the legislative bodies of the relevant constituent entity of the Russian Federation or are elected by the population of the judicial district concerned.

Examination commissions, which administer the qualifying examinations for judges, and judicial qualification boards are independent bodies within the judicial community. Their membership includes representatives of the public.

Complaints about decisions of judicial qualification boards in respect of early termination of a judge’s term of office for breach of discipline are reviewed by a special judicial authority, the Judicial Disciplinary Tribunal.

 

Author's comment

There are serious problems of access to justice in Russia. Russian courts make a large number of unjust decisions.

There is deplorable human rights situation in Russia because Russians submit the maximum number of complaints to the European Court of Human Rights and the judges commit a large number of crimes. 

Corruption in Russia has systematic and comprehensive manner, but not isolated and sporadic. Corruption crimes are committed by not individual officials and law enforce officials, but the organized criminal community consisting of officials, judges and law enforcement officers.

There are many instances of crimes committed by judges and avoiding responsibility. Often, the supervisory authorities cover up crimes by their colleagues.

 

7. Civil liberties, NGOs,

human rights defenders, journalists and elections

 

140.145. Fully ensure everyone’s right to exercise freedom of expression, including internet freedom, strengthen the dialogue with civil society and respect the rights of NGOs by eliminating all restrictive impediments (Estonia) - partially accepted;

Russia's position. Pursuant to article 29 of the Constitution, everyone has the right to freely seek out, receive, transmit, produce and disseminate information by any legal means. The freedom of the media is guaranteed. Censorship is prohibited.

However, under article 10, paragraph 2, of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to which the Russian Federation is a party, the exercise of freedom of expression may be subject to certain formalities, conditions, restrictions or sanctions, which are provided for by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public order, in order to prevent disorder or crime, to protect health and morals, or the reputation or rights of other persons, to prevent the disclosure of information received confidentially, or to ensure the authority and impartiality of the justice system.

Thus, the freedom of expression is not absolute and the recommendation to ensure its implementation “by eliminating all restrictive impediments” cannot be accepted.

The Federal Information, Information Technology and Protection of Information Act (No. 149-FZ of 27 June 2006) defined, in all, four categories of information that represent a particular danger to society and may be banned from the Internet without recourse to legal action: (1) child pornography; (2) methods for the manufacture, use and distribution of drugs; (3) methods of suicide and suicide advocacy; (4) personal information on minors who have been victims of unlawful acts.

140.148. Pay particular attention to the issue of protecting journalists and those working for the mass media in order to ensure the freedom and the legitimacy of their activities (Algeria) - accepted;

Russia's position. Crimes against journalists and human rights defenders have serious and harmful consequences on the development of society as a whole and consolidation of the idea of a State governed by the rule of law. The law enforcement agencies thus place high priority on investigating and preventing such crimes.

140.149. Intensify efforts to investigate cases of violence and intimidation against journalists and ensure that perpetrators are held to account (Austria) – accepted, see 140.148;

140.150. Investigate thoroughly, promptly and impartially all allegations of intimidation and violence against journalists and human rights defenders and bring the perpetrators to justice (Ireland) - accepted, see 140.148; 

140.151.Remove legislative and other regulations which limit the legitimate exercise of the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly and ensure that legislation is in accordance with the Russian Federation’s commitments and obligations under international law (Norway) – not accepted;

Russia's position. Because of factual inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the recommendation’s content and wording. The legislation does not limit the exercise of the right to freedom of expression, association and assembly, and is not contrary to the rules of international law.

140.152. Take necessary measures to ensure that legal provisions do not create disproportionate restrictions to exercise freedom of assembly and expression (Latvia) - accepted;

Russia's position. Russian legislation does not create disproportionate restrictions on the exercise of freedom of assembly and expression.

The Constitution guarantees the right to assemble peacefully, without weapons, and to hold meetings, rallies, demonstrations, marches and pickets. Realization of this right is an important form of citizen participation in the conduct of State affairs.

The legislation establishes a notification system for the holding of public events. An authority may refuse to agree to the holding of a public event only if the notification was submitted by a person who is not legally entitled to organize public events, or if it specifies a place where the holding of public activities is prohibited by law.

Citizens and organizations may challenge the authority’s decision in a court of law.

140.153. Review recent legislative changes with a view to fully ensuring freedom of assembly and association, in accordance with international obligations (Austria) – not accepted;

Russia's position. In the part concerning the right to freedom of association, it should be made clear that enjoyment of that right is guaranteed by the international treaties to which the Russian Federation is a party. There is no restriction in the law on the activities of non-commercial organizations, including those that receive funding from abroad and participate in political activities. The main objective of the legislative changes was to ensure greater transparency in the activities of the relevant non-commercial organizations. The public are entitled to know about the sources of funding for political activities in the country.

140.158.  Put an end to all practices limiting activities of civil society, and take concrete steps to guarantee the freedom of association (Czech Republic) - not accepted;

Russia's position. The Russian authorities do not limit the activities of non-commercial organizations; indeed, they seek to ensure the widest possible involvement of civil society in governance of the State.

The 2012 reform of the legislation on political parties significantly relaxed the requirements for their establishment and functioning. As a result, more than 70 political parties have been registered. There are also more than 90 organizing committees for the establishment of new political parties.

140.161.  End the widespread practice of arresting participants at opposition rallies and pressing charges against them (Austria) - not accepted;

Russia's position. The right of peaceful assembly is guaranteed by the Constitution. However, the exercise of this right may not violate the rights and freedoms of other citizens and, in particular, their right to personal and public safety, which must be guaranteed by the law enforcement agencies during public events.

In the performance of their duties, officers of the law enforcement agencies are subject only to the authority of the law and apply it equally to all participants in any public events.

140.165.  Alleviate legislative and administrative barriers related to the functioning of NGOs and civil society, recognizing the legitimacy of their work and contribution for the society (Slovakia) - not accepted;

140.165 Not accepted

Russia's position. Russian law does not impose any legislative or administrative barriers that restrict the activities of non-commercial organizations or civil society.

140.167.  Ensure that all human rights defenders are able to conduct their work in line with the provisions of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders  (Poland) - accepted;

140.168. Fully implement the provisions of the Human Rights Council’s resolution on “protecting human rights defenders” adopted in March 2013 (Norway) - not accepted;

Russia's position. Russian law and the international treaties to which the Russian Federation is a party provide a satisfactory level of protection for the rights of citizens and organizations and offer opportunities for their effective protection.

Furthermore, the provisions of the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution are not binding, but rather recommendatory in nature, and are not a part of the international obligations of the Russian Federation.

140.169. In line with the resolution by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe adopted on 2 October 2012, amend the new law on NGOs so that it cannot be used as an instrument of repression and intimidation of NGOs and civil society (Sweden) - not accepted;

Russia's position. The legislation does not allow these regulations to be used for the purpose of intimidation or harassment of non-commercial organizations or civil society.

140.170. Ensure that the laws concerning non-governmental organizations do not impose undue obstacles for their functioning (Latvia) - accepted;

140.171. Review its legislation regulating the functioning of NGOs, in particular the Federal Law on Non-Commercial Organizations, with a view to bringing it into accordance with international human rights law (Finland) - not accepted; 

Russia's position. The legislation does not establish any restrictions that might be inconsistent with the obligations arising from international treaties to which the Russian Federation is a party.

140.172. Rescind or soften the  law “on the modification to certain laws of the Russian Federation on regulating the activities of non-commercial organizations which exercise function of foreign agents” (Belgium) - not accepted;

140.174. Reconsider legislation adopted on inspections and audits to NGOs (Spain) - not accepted;

140.175. Repeal the amendment which requires NGOs  that accept foreign funding to register and identify themselves as “foreign agents”, as well as the amended definition of treason, and punish any harassment, intimidation or discrediting of civil society groups (Ireland) - partially accepted;

Russia's position. Repeal the registration of non-commercial organizations as “foreign agents” – not accepted.

Amend the definition of treason – not accepted. Taking into account the broad discretion that exists in establishivng responsibility for offences against the foundations of the constitutional order and the security of the State, the Russian legislature introduced necessary clarifications into the relevant articles of the Criminal Code. There is at this time no basis for repealing the amendments made.

Prosecution for any harassment, threats or discrediting of civil society groups – accepted. Ensuring the security and equality of rights of citizens is an absolute priority for the Russian authorities.

140.177. Work with the Special  Rapporteur on human rights defenders to ensure that their law governing NGOs guarantees effective implementation of the declaration on human rights defenders (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) - partially accepted;

Russia's position. The Russian Federation cooperates actively with the Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders on individual cases and on general requests in accordance with national law.

However, when considering the advisability of amending the legislation governing non-commercial organizations, the Russian authorities will be guided primarily by the interests of citizens of the Russian Federation and may take account of the views of the relevant international bodies as necessary.

140.178. Repeal provisions of the legislation regulating NGOs that require the registration of organizations receiving financial support from outside sources as “foreign agents” (Slovakia) - not accepted;

140.179. Revise  the  law  on  “foreign agents”  and  adopt measures in order to facilitate and enhance dialogue and practical cooperation between Government and civil society (Italy) - not accepted; 

140.180. Review the law on demonstrations and the so-called  law on “foreign agents”,  in  order  to  allow NGOs  to  freely  carry  out  their  activities  in Russia (France) - not accepted;

140.181. Review legislation and registration according to which NGOs that accept foreign funding must register and identify themselves as  “foreign agents” (Germany) - not accepted;

140.182. Take appropriate legislative measures to void the legislation requiring human rights organizations that receive foreign funding to register as “foreign agents” (Poland) - not accepted;

140.183. The removal of legislation that restricts civil society from receiving international funding, and cease unannounced inspections aimed at intimidating civil society organizations (United States of America) - not accepted;

Russia's position. The legislation does not restrict civil society from receiving funding from abroad, nor non-commercial organizations from conducting political activities. The main objective of the amendments to the legislation on non-commercial organizations is to ensure greater transparency in their activities.

Checks on non-commercial organizations are carried out in accordance with the relevant rules of law and are not in any way intended to put pressure on them. If they disagree with the process or results of these checks, the organizations do have the possibility to challenge the inspectors’ actions in court.

140.191. Investigate all cases of aggressions or threats against human rights defenders, journalists, and civil society activists (Netherlands) - accepted;

 

Author's comment

Russian state policy is aimed at suppressing dissent and civil society. It encroaches on civil liberties.

Legislative initiatives (laws on «foreign agents», treason, assembly, internet content restriction and other) aimed at restricting the activities of non-governmental human rights organizations and activists to prevent or repress criticism of the government.

 

According to Human Rights Watch the laws and government actions violate Russia’s international legal obligations to protect freedom of association, expression, and assembly and threaten the viability of Russia’s vibrant civil society. 

In the year since Vladimir Putin’s return to the presidency in May 2012, the Russian government has unleashed a crackdown on civil society unprecedented in the country’s post-Soviet history. The authorities have introduced a series of restrictive laws, harassed, intimidated, and in several cases imprisoned political activists, interfered in the work of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and sought to cast government critics as clandestine enemies, thereby threatening the viability of Russia’s civil society.   

Two of the new laws – the “foreign agents” law and the “Dima Yakovlev law” – clearly seek to limit, or even end, independent advocacy and other NGO work by placing new, draconian limits on association with foreigners and foreign funding. 

The “Dima Yakovlev law” essentially bans funding emanating from the United States for “political” NGO activity and bans NGOs whose work is “directed against Russia’s interests.” 

The treason law expands the legal definition of treason in ways that could criminalize involvement in international human rights advocacy. 

 As these laws were being debated and adopted, pro-government media outlets ran propaganda campaigns targeting prominent nongovernmental groups, accusing them of promoting Western interests in exchange for funding.  

 The “foreign agents” law expanded already extensive and intrusive state control over organizations that receive foreign funding by setting out additional reporting requirements and providing for additional inspections by government bodies. It equates receiving any foreign funding with being an agent of foreign interests.

The term “foreign agent” in Russia is ubiquitously understood as spy or traitor, and it is difficult to avoid the impression that by adopting this law, Russian authorities sought to discredit and demonize certain civil society groups that accept foreign funding.

The treason law broadened the definition of treason by adding the provision of “consultative or other assistance to a foreign state, an international or foreign organization … in activities against the security of the Russian Federation” to the list of actions that can constitute state treason. This new definition leaves broad room for officials to arbitrarily interpret and selectively apply it against individuals engaged in routine discussions with foreign counterparts or presenting human rights reports at international conferences.

The United Nations Committee Against Torture, for example, said the law could be interpreted as prohibiting the sharing of information on the human rights situation in the Russian Federation with the UN.

You can see relevant  information of Human Rights Watch, UN bodies, interested organizations at

http://www.hrw.org/reports/2013/04/24/laws-attrition

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/RUSession16.aspx

 

8. Economic, social and cultural rights

  

140.197. Adopt a national strategy integrating economic, social and cultural rights to combat poverty (South Africa) - partially accepted;

Russia's position. Combating poverty is one of the main thrusts of the Russian authorities’ social and economic policy. However, it is the national legislature that has the competence to select the most appropriate form of regulation to combat poverty effectively (such as a national strategy, a plan of action, a State programme, etc.).

 

Author's comment

According to official state data, less than 20% of the Russian population has income below the subsistence minimum.

But really the majority of Russians live below poverty line because undervaluation of minimum social standards, low real purchasing power of cash income, unreliability of average statistical data, overestimating prices and tariffs.

Real information on the actual socio-economic situation of Russia will be presented to the UN bodies.

Absence of conditions for a decent life not only leads to lower quality of life, but also to elementary hunger and total poverty, consequence of which is physical extinction of population.

It is a result of unfair distribution of national income in Russia which is spent only to ensuring good life officials and oligarchs.

Living space in Russia (profitable business, high-paying jobs, lucrative public contracts) is distributed among officials and oligarchs, their relatives and friends.

In these conditions it is impossible to create a comprehensive socially-oriented state policy.

 

9. Rights of ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples

 

140.219. Ensure the right of indigenous people to their ancestral lands through the implementation of the relevant legislation with measurable targets and effective data collection (Hungary) - accepted;

Russia's position. Legislation already gives small indigenous peoples priority in the use of land and natural resources.

The Federal Act on Territories of Traditional Resource Use of Small Indigenous Peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation, the policy framework for the sustainable development of small indigenous peoples and a number of other laws and regulations have been adopted to protect those peoples’ ancestral habitat and traditional ways of life and to preserve biological diversity in territories of traditional resource use.

The Land Code enshrines the right of indigenous peoples’ communities to use agricultural land to preserve and develop their traditional ways of life, livelihoods and crafts.

140.220. Harmonize the various laws on the rights of indigenous peoples, particularly regarding their access to land and natural resources (Mexico) - accepted;

140.221. Strengthen federal and local legislation in favour of the rights of indigenous peoples (Bolivia (Plurinational State of)) - accepted;

140.223. Officially endorse the  United Nations  Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and fully implement all relevant national laws and regulations (Denmark) - not accepted;

Russia's position. The Government’s policy on small indigenous peoples is aimed at ensuring those peoples’ sustainable development and is based on provisions of national legislation that are, to a large degree, identical to the provisions of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Russian legislation and law enforcement practice in respect of the rights of indigenous peoples and the preservation and development of their cultures goes substantially further than the provisions of the Declaration, extending its boundaries.

140.224. Improve the precarious situation of indigenous peoples, particularly by stepping up efforts to guarantee their right to education, including in their own languages; unrestricted use of their lands and territories; address the problem of underrepresentation in State institutions at the federal and regional levels and follow other principles enshrined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Estonia) - partially accepted;

Russia's position. Approval of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – not accepted. See 140.223.

Guarantee of the rights of indigenous peoples to education and the use of land resources – accepted. See 140.219.

Representation of indigenous people in the State institutions – accepted and already implemented in practice. There are no laws or regulations that restrict the rights of small indigenous peoples to occupy public positions. Indeed, the Russian Federation provides supplementary guarantees of informed and meaningful participation by representatives of indigenous peoples in decision-making.

140.225. Increase its budget allocation for indigenous peoples (Namibia) - not accepted;

Russia's position. The authorities have already allocated substantial funds to support the development of small indigenous peoples. A total of approximately 12 billion roubles were allocated from State budgets at various levels during the period 2009–2011. The amount allocated in the future will be determined on the basis of need and the financial possibilities of the respective budgets.

140.229. Take action to stop the atrocities committed by  some individuals against immigrants, especially in Moscow (Chad) - accepted;

 

Author's comment

Russia presented false and untrue information.

Indigenous peoples are still deprived of priority access to lands and natural resources, and cannot influence activities of industrial enterprises, operating on their traditional lands. 

Russian officials removed norms from legislation on free use of lands by indigenous peoples.

Despite the adoption of the Federal law «On territories of traditional nature use of indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation» there is not a single territory of traditional nature use.



[ íà ãëàâíóþ ñòðàíèöó ]


Ïóáëèêàöèÿ ìàòåðèàëîâ â ñðåäñòâàõ ìàññîâîé èíôîðìàöèè ðàçðåøåíà òîëüêî ïîñëå ñîãëàñîâàíèÿ c YAKUTIA-NM. Ðàçðåøàåòñÿ íåêîììåð÷åñêîå èñïîëüçîâàíèå ìàòåðèàëîâ â ïåðñîíàëüíûõ öåëÿõ, ïðè óñëîâèè óïîìèíàíèÿ èñòî÷íèêà.
Ïðè èñïîëüçîâàíèè ìàòåðèàëîâ ññûëêà íà http://yakutian.org îáÿçàòåëüíà. E-mail : post@yakutian.org
YAKUTIA - NASHE MNENIE © 2007-2011 All rights reserved